the red versus blue, or wards of the sate vs words of the state

Communists masquerading as enlightened, com]assionate progressives within the safe port of a capitalist constitutional republic might decide, as per the moving goal post of "liberty', that if a lot of people wanted cell phones, then a new decree would provide free cell phones for each ward of the state, deeming a cell phone as a basic human right. And during an economic downturn, or if there were popular headwinds from the average citizen, then everyone would get a free phone.  The conservatives would insist on not providing the new entitlement to illegal immigrants, and liberals would diatonically disagree, and also ask to include prisoners.

I note here i refer to "the entitlement class", or people who rely so much on a system payout, as "wards of the state", which is a bit of an irregular usage of the term.

We note too, like the obama, the baruch, the zhivago from chicago, schecter elizondo, was a "constitutional student and lawyer" however being of the disposition that the literal meaning of the u.s. constitution is irrelevent, being a "living document", such that the meanings might be tampered or tempered to fit collective whims.

But then so called consututionalist representatives have a platform to not entirely honor the founding document, but to alter it to their own seperate vision of constitutionality.